Gravimotion in the professional press:
Gravimotion's idea cannot be submitted to journals of physics as not worthy of physics own self-image. As an example see Wikipedia controversy below.
Professional physicists simply disregard non-mathematical theories let alone stray ideas.
Gravimotion on Internet:
"Gravimotion.info" website (this site) offers only an introduction to the Gravimotion theory.
Gravimotion's site has nevertheless some success. A counter has been installed on the site on August 10 2007. From that date to September 9, 422 persons visited the site. The visitors are from all over the English-speaking world. 50% of the visits come from the USA. Visits from universities are not uncommon, even from other technical governmental organizations such as NASA.
The site has a companion site called MCtwo.info.
MCtwo.info specializes on physics' topics that challenge common sense and as such are of particular interest from the Gravimotion point of view.
MCtwo.info was created on DEC 30 2006. For information on the traffic recorded since then, click on MCtwo.info/tiki-stats and on MCtwo.info/tiki-blogs.
Note that the 3rd item 'Total pageviews' (in the Tiki-stats reference) includes hits by automatic spiders, crawlers and what not from search engines. The interesting numbers are about the blogs, which are visited by "real" people.
History of Gravimotion
In January 2001, the idea of Gravimotion appeared in the mind of the author while flying from San Francisco to Paris.
Thanks to web.archive.org, you can go back and consult earlier thoughts, click on: web.archive.org
And again thanks to web.archive.org, you can go back and consult more recent thoughts, click on: web.archive.org
Gravimotion controversy on Wikipedia:
In January 2007, the inventor of Gravimotion posted an article titled "Gravimotion" on Wikipedia.
The content of the article is reproduced in this site at: Gravimotion in a nutshell (link provided in the Navigation Box).
In May of 2007, Wikipedia's crew discovered it and immediately asked for deletion.
The inventor tried to fight the deletion, to no avail.
The gravimotion idea, not in line with conventional physics, and as such not endorsed by a single physicist so far, has been judged not worthy of wikipedia. And that assertion was the less humiliating that was used by the judges!
The inventor ended up agreeing that gravimotion is incompatible with physics theories and under pressure had to delete the article himself.
The whole debate is disclosed at: Gravimotion wikipedia deletion debate.
Since Wikipedia articles may be modified at any time, and some of those who intervened might want to erase their own writing, the inventor kept a cache (a copy dated Aug 27 2007) of the debate.
The controversy's good side.
The inventor is now prepared!
The inventor learned a lesson; face to face with gravimotion, some among the physicists drop their alleged objectivity and turn themselves into implacable judges.
The inventor rebuttal is a question! How would those physicists who also claim that their irrational conclusions don't make sense could understand Gravimotion that does makes sense?
All active pages of this site are identified "XHTML 1.0 Transitional" and passed successfully a formal validation using an appropriate Parser.